Writings/ Books
The Trauma Mantras: A Memoir in Prose Poems
Read the Foreword by Yusef Komunyakaa
Adrie Kusserow’s The Trauma Mantras speaks directly to us. Such is a testament of reckoning, a solid collection of distilled observations, an upturning of physical and psychic realities, as well as heartfelt reflections. This poet’s hard work goes to the paydirt of realism wherever the speaker travels. These short poetic meditations are well-made actions—not merely generated but lived—with jagged edges. And the reader must be ready to go there, to feel and dream the rhythmic burn of language as rage and beauty converge, and to arrive at a place of needful contemplation.
The speaker faces a revealing juncture:
“Our hunter-gatherer bodies are still designed to vibrate when close to another’s animacy, the frenetic hum and bubbling of the urge to describe a tulip, peach, wild rose, mountain or fox before the next text comes in.
It is this desire to venture into the pulsating clay, even to the other side, that requires a give-and-take, but not by a typical directive or calming image map. The Trauma Mantras is exciting; and perhaps this is more so because the speaker raises questions as a tool or weapon. Not for the sake of anecdotes, but for how one might journey to truly feel, to learn, to be(come) part of personal inquiry with eyes on the collective. In this sense, each poetic essay is a deep voyage. We readers engage multiple voices revealing personal histories of hurt and pain, reaching out for vital connections and mature insight—hurting for what we risk being made of. The voices this writer gives us are a treasure because of the intrinsic dialogue of contrasts. Going through dilemma and pain, coming to a curative pause, and then we realize ascension most likely is a long road ahead.
As an anthropologist and poet, Kusserow is also a serious teacher and activist, someone whose commitment runs deeply. Her passion is here in each trope. And she does not let herself off the hook as she delves into numerous social and political ills troubling humanity. In this sense, hers is a world voice. The reader cannot escape understanding the poetry on every page of The Trauma Mantras. It reveals but does not blame. Yet, what we witness through imagery becomes evidence—woven in the language. And in this breathing music we hold ourselves accountable. We feel these essays, even in those moments when we’re caught slightly off guard.
The Trauma Mantras is a gift across cultures. And it is only natural that vicissitude is casted in our journey. The word-groupings throughout the text, for the most part, slow the reader till he or she grows momentarily engaged in meditation. Yes, Kusserow is an anthropologist and a poet, and we must hear and feel both fused as one—an immersion—tonally. Each focus reveals art. Such brave work exposes any unearned grace note; this writer gives the world a robust spirit of truth-seeking. Her language is straightforward, caring, and gutsy. What more do we dare ask an artist-seer to surrender or give of herself?
January, 2023
Refuge
As an anthropologist, Adrie Kusserow's ethnographic poetry probes culture and globalization with poems about Sudanese refugees based in Uganda, Sudan, and the United States, especially the "Lost Boys of Sudan." The poet struggles with how to respond to suffering, poverty, displacement, and the brutal aspects of war. Much of this exploration is based in poems in which a mother is also bringing her family to a larger global arena.
The poems in Refuge are dispatches from the world we live in but don’t often, if ever, have to think about. As I write this, Kusserow has stamped her passport to South Sudan, rolled up her sleeves, and continued her ongoing work in the larger world. Not only do the poems in Refuge serve to witness that which would otherwise be given to the erasures of history, they transcend borders and serve as bridges to a deeply human experience.
~Brian Turner
Kusserow’s splendid verses bring us devastatingly close to the recent horrors of the southern Sudan and its lost boys. Her ethnographic gaze is compelling and her poems plunge us into unfamiliar social worlds, bringing us the news we need to know. Both anthropology and poetry stand enriched by her work.
~Renato Rosaldo
There are responsibilities that the poet must be held to by her readers, and by the ancient chain of voices she makes claim to with the publication of a collection of poetry. Those responsibilities have to do with form, language, and with a keen regard for subject. In this case, Adrie Kusserow’s subject matter is unhesitatingly autobiographical, illustrative of a life interwoven with motherhood, and with an abiding commitment to critical development work in South Sudan. Her poems are bold and new and original in their emotional and geographic sweep of the human landscape. They are beautiful to feel on your mouth when you say them out loud.
~Bruce Weigl
Hunting Down the Monk
The Dalai Lama, characterizing Westerners who move, as Captain Sir Richard Burton did a century ago, from religion to religion in a quest for spiritual comfort, has called them/us “spiritual tourists.” Burton moved from an arid Anglicanism, to Hinduism, to join an abstruse Moslem sect. The inheritors of his search have moved even farther afield. We are, a century after the advent of Darwin and more than a century after having embraced the scientific method, in the turmoil of a spiritual revolution, attempting to remake our understanding of religious and spiritual life. There is nothing we won’t investigate, taste, smell, eat, or listen to in our search.
Adrie Kusserow in the poems of her starkly frank, frequently gritty first book confronts this situation like a boxer squaring off for a knockout. In the title poem, “Hunting Down the Monk” the nomads “wander from meaning station/to meaning station” looking for gods who “surface because/we feed them.” This interdependence of god and humanity is a recurrent motif. Although the first poems are situated in Nepal she covers most, if not all, religious bases unstintingly –Unitarian, Jehova’s Witness, Greek Orthodox, snake handling Christians and Buddhism, to name a few.
As is true of all exceptional poets, Kusserow not only isolates a painful conundrum of her time but imbues it with the emotional ambiance that reverberates about it, developing a depth of field around her subjects. The searchers in her poems may sometimes look foolish, but their pain and need is made searingly real to us. They are in crisis. The misunderstandings between the seekers and those who appear to be comfortably ensconsed in their beliefs only intensify need and pain. The overwhelming desire to believe is a hunger, an anorexia, which she parallels hauntingly with the physical neediness of the East – hungry, desperate children, women unwittingly lured into the prostitution in order to help their families eat. But Kusserow’s universe is a difficult one full of questions, devoid of “cheap, creamy answers” even when what is being presented is “only God’s words,/the whole truth, no additives.”
Having been trained in a number of schools which will not allow her to pass easily through the eye of faith’s needle, Kusserow is frustrated in her search. The Western disbelief in hierarchy, which as Solzhenitsyn has pointed out, automatically destroys moral authority, is a natural outcome of democracy and withers the ability to believe. Her rigorous training in the scientific method, as a cultural anthropologist, naturally casts out other beliefs because its god is doubt. She is caught, “hanging like a bat in the walls of the bardo” between her childhood Christ, a rainbow of religions , and science. A subsidiary problem is that all of these religions issue from men and tend to deny the rich sensuality of life. That sensuality is apparent in her lustrous use of the language she refuses to abrogate.
All of this, which could be a heavy, indeed, logy philosophical brew is rendered sharp, razor clean and clear as Himalayan air by her imagery and brilliant sense of words. She makes them crackle like morning frost on a tent at 16,000 feet. She creates not only her situations but her language new. The women of Kathmandu are “dressed like tropical drinks.” Kathmandu itself is a “Buddhist base camp” full of “nouveau monks – in their Ray-Bans, Nikes, burgundy hair.” Around all this she skulks like a dog to “sniff the borders/of other faiths.” She is well aware that she is close to being like a woman who “shifts from red to chameleon lime depending/on what branch of God she’s on.” Returning to Protestantism in her mother’s New England church she has a respite but no answer among “acres of elderly widows wearing gardens of pastels.”
There is an umbilical cord for Kusserow between lack of belief and isolation, the desperate, if not despairing, loneliness with which all thinking Westerners are well acquainted. To not have a belief, a faith, is to be without community, to live your life as a singular entity, as a spider devoid of its web. Love and the sensual, birth and the relationship with both humans and nature provides the gifts of continuity and wholeness. Out of her sense of the sensual comes another sort of belief, a variety of pantheistic wonder that gives a spiritual connection with the world in her poems “Snowflake Bentley” about the man who first took photographs of snowflakes through a microscope. She describes how he sorted “snowflakes with a feather/holding his breath/to spare the life of each flake” sensing, as she does herself,
the snow crunching
as his center of gravity slowly shifted,
making room
for the joy of the infinite
opening inside him.
Kinship with both the human and natural world is what drives out isolation and creates community. We see this in Kusserow’s response to the birth of her child, about which she has created a lovely, long lyrical poem. The child’s newborn hunger echoes all the other hungers which have preceded her birth:
Still nursing, but stormily now, legs kicking,
Her free hand batting against my chest
Like a small twig against a window.
Perhaps it is the giving to hunger rather than hungering that eases the ache around the vacancy where belief used to be.
Another replacement for Kusserow’s faith is to love not the belief created by men but an individual man. The old yearning still lingers, however, as when she writes of “the way stained glass/renews a stale God.” Through these various channels she arrives at an acceptance of death as an opening, which occurs when the body
accepts what it fears:
It moves from solid to liquid,
It gives in and becomes the world.
The final poems in the book give evolution a spiritual rather than physical meaning as they recognize that loneliness is as inseparably lashed to ego, as Ahab is lashed to Moby Dick’s flank, a decidedly Buddhist thought which brings us to the end with a flourish. The last two poems – Buddhist odes to her daughter telling her to let go of the mind –
Hush, little one.
Nothing I tell you
Will ever measure up.
Nothing else will coax the small fists
Of your brain
To open this wide.
Suggest she has found a spiritual resting place of sorts in Buddhism and the mountains, ponds, and hills surrounding her Vermont home. She sees herself as growing into the world as Bentley in his snowflakes saw the infinite. Hunting Down the Monk is a volume of ripe thought from a vigorous mind, strikingly expressed in rich and vibrant language. Who could ask for more?
Karen Swenson
American Individualisms
Palgrave MacMillan – Culture, Mind and Society Series, 2005
What are hard and soft individualisms? In this detailed ethnography of three communities in Manhattan and Queens, Kusserow interviews parents and teachers (from wealthy to those on welfare) on the types of hard and soft individualisms they encourage in their children and students. American Individualisms explores the important issue of class differences in the socialization of individualism in America. It presents American individualism not as one single homogeneous, stereotypic life-pattern as often claimed to be, but as variable, class-differentiated models of individualism instilled in young children by their parents and preschool teachers in Manhattan and Queens. By providing rich descriptions of the situational, class-based individualisms that take root in communities with vastly different visions of the future, Kusserow brings social inequality back into previously bland and generic discussions of American individualism. (Good Reads)
Review from AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST
In her imaginatively conceived ethnography, Adrie Kusserow examines the issue of "individualism" as manifested in the socialization of children in three quite distinct communities, all within the boundaries of New York City. The key question she asks herself is whether the upper-middle class and the working class espouse the same kinds of individualism or does each group possibly have different meanings and uses? "Parkside" is her pseudonym for a segment of Manhattan's Upper East Side. Located an hour and a half subway ride from Manhattan, the other two neighborhoods she dubs "Kelley" and "Queenston" are in the Far Rockaway area of Queens, just a few subway stops from one another, but as different from one another as Shirley Brice Heath's white working-class "Roadville" and the black working-class "Trackton."
But this is not a sociolinguistic study, nor is it an examination of racial disparity. The author makes clear that early on in her research she decided that looking at class, race, and gender all at once would be too much to tackle. She decided instead to tease out the variable of "class" in the predominately white "silk stocking district" located along Fifth Avenue and Park Avenue, as well as in working-class "Kelley" (98 percent white; two percent Hispanic and black) and lower-working class "Queenston" (86 percent white; six percent black; five percent Hispanic; two percent Asian), a blighted and troubled neighborhood with little sign of community life. Her participant-observation took her to four preschools in the mornings; her afternoons were devoted to interviewing the children's parents.
The preschools Kusserow studied were roughly reflective of parent culture with what she calls a "soft" individualism predominating in Manhattan, a "hard" individualism predominating in Kelley and an equally hard individualism found in Queenston, despite the best efforts of public school teachers in the latter area to inculcate an uppermiddle-class "soft," "psychologized" individualism. School posters recommending social learning objectives were written in a formal language quite foreign to most Queenston parents. The discourse of soft psychologism, recommending to a working-class mother that she take a hot bath instead of yelling at her child, completely ignored the fact that she might not have the time or the resources to take a hot bath. Kusserow aptly draws a parallel between her own findings and Philippe Bourgois's poignant observation in In Search of Respect that immigrant children, in order to obey their mothers' admonishments that they respect their teachers, would have to betray their love for their mothers in order to do well in school.
The Manhattan children have doormen to protect them; the Queens children learn that public space is not always safe. The message from Queens parents to their children was that to become individuals they needed (a) to "stick up for themselves," (b) not be too sensitive, and, (c) simultaneously, learn to "follow the rules" at school. In contrast, the philosophy of the Manhattan parents was not to toughen the child's self from the outside world but, rather, to help the child's self blossom out in order to attain her full potential. Thus, in Manhattan, metaphors of "softness" and "warmth" were used in contrast to the fortress metaphors of the Queenston parents and the sports images of the more confident Kelley parents. Parkside parents also instilled values, but they conceptualized the child's self as a more flexible entity, not one needing the "firmware" that Queens parents advocated. Psychoanalysts like Peter Fonagy see human identity not as a Cartesian monadic substrate but as an entity continually constructed out of social interactions. In this respect, Kusserow's work expands these insights into the ways that class mediates such interaction.
In a book whose chief raison d'être is cultural capital, the author is open and sensitive about what she refers to as her own Harvard-upper-middle-class-like habitus that gives her special entrée into the lives of the Parkside parents. Her observations about the tendency of Parkside teachers to present a kind, gentle demeanor that also hides emotions such as anger and frustration is particularly astute. One comes away with the impression that Parkside parents and teachers, in their permissiveness and the desire to foster the "flowering" of their child, also often avoid the "teachable moment"-the moment at which one needs to draw limits and confront the child's bullying, the occasional ethnic slurs, the inevitable gay bashing, the issues of drugs and alcohol, and the other thousand natural shocks to which North American childhood and adolescence are heir. In general, from her Upper East Side data, one detects an avoidance by the adults of the formidable job of "taking on" the child's peer group and the values of a Madison Avenue-driven consumerism.
Finally, Cameron McCarthy demonstrated a decade ago that the variables of race and gender could not be fully explicated apart from class considerations. Kusserow's important research on individualism as mediated through the class structure could also profitably be expanded in the future to include the formidable contradictions and "nonsynchrony" of gender, race, and class to which McCarthy draws our attention.
JOHN DEVINE